Exchange rates are used to compare international prices of goods and services. They are also used to compare the return on foreign currency-denominated stocks and bonds to the return on domestic assets. In the 1970s, the stress was on the monetary approach to balance of payments.

Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach Formula
Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach
Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach Pdf
Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach Examples
Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach Definition

See interest rate, nominal. Money rate of return. Annual money return as a percentage of asset value. M1-A: Currency plus demand deposits M1-B: M1-A plus other checkable deposits. M2: M1-B plus overnight repos, money market funds, savings, and small (less than $100M) time deposits. M3: M-2 plus large time deposits and term repos.

Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach

The focus of attention in this approach was on international trade flows as primary determinants of exchange. One reason for this was that up to 1960s, government’s maintained tight restrictions on international flow of financial capital.

Real money demand is graphed holding fixed real income and expected inflation. The real money supply is equal to the nominal amount of M1, denoted M 0, divided by the fixed aggregate price level, P 0. It is assumed that the Fed does not alter the money supply based on the valued of the real interest rate.
Changes in desired real balances (in the demand for money) tend to proceed slowly and gradually or to be the result of events set in train by prior changes in supply, whereas, in contrast. Substantial changes in the supply of nominal balances can and frequently do occur independently of any changes in demand.
Nominal cash flow Simply put, nominal cash flow refers to the actual dollar amount of money that a company expects to take in and pay out, without any adjustment for inflation. This is useful for.
Growth in real output (i.e., real GDP) will increase the demand for money and will increase the nominal interest rate if the money supply is held constant. On the other hand, if the supply of money increases in tandem with the demand for money, the Fed can help to stabilize nominal interest rates and related quantities (including inflation).

The role of exchange rate changes in dominating international trade imbalances suggests that countries with current trade surpluses should have an appreciating currency whereas countries with trade deficits should have depreciating currencies. Such exchange rate changes would lead to changes in international relative prices that would work to eliminate the trade imbalances like surplus or deficit.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

In recent years, due to financial liberalisation, the volume of international trade in financial assets has far exceeded trade in goods and services. Moreover, there are some instances where countries with trade surpluses have depreciating currencies, whereas countries with trade deficits have appreciating currencies.

This is why a new approach to exchange rate determination has been devised. This is known as the asset approach or portfolio balance approach which explains the real-world events. This theory places a much greater emphasis on the role of the exchange rate as one of many prices in the global market for financial assets. In this context, we consider the asset approach to exchange rate determination in detail.

The asset approach to exchange rate determination emphasises financial markets for assets. Whereas the traditional view is that the exchange rate gets adjusted to equilibrate international trade in goods, the asset approach suggests that the exchange rate gets adjusted to equilibrate international transactions (flows) in financial assets.

Real Vs Nominal Money Supply In Asset Approach Formula

Since prices of goods adjust slowly relative to prices of financial assets and financial assets are traded continuously every day, the shift in emphasis from goods market to assets markets has important implications. Exchange rates will change any day as supplies and demands for financial assets of different nations change.

The asset approach assumes perfect capital mobility. This means that capital flows freely between countries in the absence of significant transactions cost or capital controls (in a liberalised era).

In a world in which there are no barriers to international capital flows, covered interest arbitrage will ensure covered interest rate parity:

where i_d is the domestic interest rate and i_fis the foreign interest rate. Since this relationship will hold continuously, spot and forward exchanges as well as interest rates adjust instantaneously in response to changing financial market conditions.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Paul R. Krugman has developed the asset approach to exchange rate determination. Krugman’s approach seeks to establish the relation between interest rate and exchange rate just as the PPP theory seeks to establish a relation between price levels and exchange rates. Two main attributes of assets remaining the same, viz., risk and liquidity, investors prefer to hold assets which offer the highest expected real rate of return.

This statement holds when investors have the option of investing those funds either within their domestic country or abroad. And the return on an asset, such as interest rate on foreign bonds, plays an important role in exchange rate determination.

The rate of return on a deposit of a particular currency is the interest rate or the amount of that currency an individual earns by lending a Unit of currency for a year. This is the variable which determines whether an individual will invest his funds within the domestic economy or abroad. He will always compare the rates of interest which prevail in two different countries, viz, the home country and foreign country, while deciding which asset (domestic or foreign) to buy.

Interest rates play an important role in the foreign exchange market because different deposits traded in such a market pay different interest rates. In other words, each type of deposit pays a certain amount of interest depending on the currency in which it is denominated (i.e., whether in dollar or in pound or, now, in euro).

The dollar interest rate is simply the dollar rate of return on dollar deposits. Similarly, a foreign currency’s interest rate measures the foreign currency return on deposits of that currency (such as the British pound).

The interest rate offered by a dollar and a British deposit will indicate how their dollar and pound values will change over a year. The rates of return offered by a dollar and pound deposits also depends on the expected change in the dollar/pound exchange rate over the year.

How can we find out which deposit offers a higher expected rate of return? To answer this question, we have to raise another question: If an American uses dollar to buy a pound deposit, how many dollars will he get back after a year? In order to answer this question we have to calculate the dollar rate of return on a pound deposit because we are comparing the dollar price today with its dollar price after a year.

A Simple Rule:

We know that the rate of depreciation of the dollar against the pound is the percentage change in the dollar/pound exchange rate. The dollar rate of return on British deposits is the British interest plus the rate of depreciation of the dollar against the pound. Thus, to translate the pound return on pound deposits in terms of dollar, we have to add the rate at which the pound’s dollar price rises over a year to the pound interest rate.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Suppose the pound interest rate is 5% and the expected depreciation of the dollar is 6% in one year. Thus the expected dollar return on pound deposits will be 11 %. Now, the expected rate of return on a pound deposit, measured in terms of dollar, is the sum of (1) the pound interest rate; and (2) the expected rate of dollar depreciation against the pound